[Raytrace] Optimization
Peter John Smith
pjifl@bigpond.com.au
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:35:45 +1000
Richard,
> I probably did not explain this well enough.
>
> Step 1 was to optimize the design using the built-in wavelengths.
> The Polychromatic Strehl was measured using both the measures
> provided in Zemax and OSLO.
>
> Step 2a The wavelengths were shifted (same respective weights, though)
> and the designed was reoptimized for the new wavelengths.
>
> Step 2b The wavelengths were shifted back to the built-in wavelengths,
> but without redoing optimization; just reverting back to the
> original measurement point. The Polychromatic Strehl was measured
> again using both the measures.
>
> The results:
>
> Although OSLO systematicly gave a slightly lower Strehl ratio
> than Zemax, both gave HIGHER Strehl Ratios in step 2b than
> in step 1.
I have No explanation. Care to send me the Zemax files from step 1 and step
2a. You can send them to me as attachments if you like. I would rather
have the actual Zemax files because the difference may be a subtle setting
somewhere that would not be obvious in a prescription output.
The difference between 0.84 and 0.86 is not a lot but it would be nice to
trace down what is happening.
Peter Smith.